Focus


     Excerpted from a letter to Councilor Bynum from local Tulsa resident Cherie Cook who has been an active neighborhood leader for many years.

     City Councilors surely must know by now, that in a Council position, as with any elected public office, there will always be criticism in some form.  Most Councilors should be aware that the citizens of Tulsa have long been refused an “official voice” or “seat at the table” with regards to planning, development, zoning or anything else related to quality of life issues for all taxpayers.  We are automatically put in an adversarial position by the very system currently in place, INCOG.  In fact, several current and previous Councilors won their seats with their promise to seek changes in this process on behalf of and with the support of their constituents. 

     I believe that all parties involved in any dispute or decision deserve respect & courtesy.  All of us share  important American rights; freedom of speech and the right to disagree!  We are allowed to voice these disputes publicly.  For City Councilors to react almost automatically in a public, negative, hurtful way against the very neighborhood leaders who work diligently with many City officials, some for many years, trying to improve quality of life for all of Tulsa, is unfair and simply not right.  I refer to recent comments made by Councilors Westcott, Martinson and Gomez, about neighborhood advocates Chip Atkins, and Julie Hall. 

     This situation is very similar to the outrage and reaction to previous City Councilors who advocated change and to groups who disagreed who asked for a recall petition.  Threatening frivolous lawsuits against the citizens without additional research of the facts and without contacting the parties involved for clarification, is ridiculous and makes a mockery of our governing process.  Not to mention, hindering the efforts and credibility of Neighborhood Associations and their leadership roles. The Tulsa World loves this kind of banter which only adds yet another negative connotation to the Neighborhoods.

     So, why would it be a surprise that on controversial zoning matters, there will be issues and challenges that need to be addressed.  Let me make a few pertinent points:

  1. During the council meeting I witnessed on TGOV, Councilor Martinson mentioned he had seen the letters of support for the Credit Union/Bank at the corner of 14th & Lewis that were sent to Councilor Gomez.  Did anyone think to verify whether these letters were from actual residents of the neighborhood affected by the change?
  2.  Did the letter writers reside or own a business within 300 feet of this change in zoning? 
  3. How many letters were sent in support as compared to those who sent opposition by emails or appeared to speak before you? 
  4. References to compensation could actually mean, campaign contributions made to certain elected officials or candidates in support of their decision to seek the office.

     Has any Councilor taken the initiative to review the process for filing an ethics complaint?  I was informed that there is no editing or final review of comments prior to the forwarding of the complaint. In other words, the person trying to make the complaint has no control over what may be actually submitted once the initial complaint has been recorded.  Isn’t this once again, about problems with a process?  Was Chip contacted by any Councilor?

     As to Julie Hall, the subject of the Mental Health facility is still being talked about, as only one example of our broken development process.  Regardless whether one agrees or disagrees, the process that allowed this project to move forward without public notice and input is the very core reason that problems remain for planning & zoning decisions made in the City of Tulsa under the present system.  This is not news anymore.

     Thankfully, with Councilor Christiansen’s recently acquired knowledge and help, he has opened dialog with a number of citizens, while he continued to learn the complexities and sheer magnitude and impact of the decisions being made on the taxpayers’ behalf.  Today we learned the Mayor has asked him to chair the newly formed Task Force to discuss the development process.  This is a great idea and we are grateful for his dedication to continue the discussion and learn more about what changes may need to be made.

     The entire development process with regards to planning, zoning, permitting and enforcement in the City of Tulsa and INCOG is an ongoing nightmare for many of us.  It is imperative that all parties make a commitment for change as this group moves toward possible solutions to this dilemma to submit to the Mayor and Council.  This work will require a great deal of personal time and is without compensation, as we, the neighborhood leaders, have always done as a gesture of good will and genuine caring about Tulsa and its future. 

Author:  Cherie Cook, member of Coalition of Historic Neighborhoods and long-time neighborhood advocate.

If you find yourself at 81st and Mingo and you haven’t seen the Sonoma Grande Apartment project at 7893 S. 95th East Ave, please take a moment to see where this project abuts the adjacent single-family homes. PreserveMidtown was there February 12, to attend a press conference for a newly formed network of citizens interested in having their voices heard in the city development process. SONY DSC

We were struck by the stories of the people in this neighborhood. One homeowner trying to sell her home has had to reduce the asking price by 20% after potential buyers see what is in her backyard. We asked a real estate agent attending the meeting if she thought this project affected the value of these homes and she said “Without a doubt!”

At the last city council meeting, Councilor Christiansen informed the neighbors that this was such a mess that they needed to hire an attorney. Some of these homeowners are retired World War II vets, some are retirees on fixed incomes. The homeowners told us that the idea of paying tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees to sue the city you trusted to protect your property rights is overwhelming. But what recourse do these homeowners have?

PreserveMidtown is not against new development. We are for smart growth. Tulsa cannot afford to turn development away but can it afford to alienate taxpayers or ruin the environment that attracted the developers in the first place? PreserveMidtown believes, along with this new neighborhood network, that there needs to be more transparency, accountability, consistency and involvement of the neighbors in development projects.

If you are the leader of a neighborhood group, member of a homeowner’s association or just want to stay connected with zoning issues, email us at tulsaneighborhoodnetwork@gmail.com.

The Sonoma Grande project is very controversial and will be the subject of discussion for a long time as resident homeowners try to determine how the current city development process failed them. We hope you will stay informed and remember when it comes election time in November for the mayor and city councilors, become educated about the issues, and vote for the candidate that is going to take care of you, your neighborhood and your city.

Transparency in Tulsa!

This month I am focusing on the meaning of the word “transparency.” This term has been used recently in the news regarding government affairs on the local, state and national levels. In fact, president-elect Barack Obama is including this concept of transparency as he forms his new government.

Transparency implies openness, communication and accountability. It is the opposite of privacy. An activity is transparent if all information about it is freely available. Transparency includes open meetings, financial statements, the Freedom of Information Act, budgetary reviews, audits, etc. In politics transparency is used as a means of holding public officials accountable and fighting corruption.

What does transparency do for us? Transparency has everything to do with our trust in a person or an entity. Transparency in government lets us see through the proposed actions and understand what is at stake. Effort is made to inform and include those that are affected the most in the decision making process. There areno hidden agendas.

To be exclusive instead of inclusive creates distrust and suspicions. It makes people feel powerless to affect their quality of life. This in turn leads to disagreements, arguments, and potential litigation. It creates a divide or barrier which polarizes our community.

Let’s face it, we all want a piece of the “good life” for ourselves and our children. We want great public education, safe and comfortable neighborhoods, a decent job and a healthy environment to live in. Our leaders and citizens should be working together to make this happen for the best interests of everyone.

Unfortunately, in Tulsa there has not been transparency at all levels in the public policy making processes. Therefore there is a growing wave of distrust and anger by some residents. Trust is easy to lose and very difficult to regain.

I do commend our Mayor Kathy Taylor for her promotion of the use of the city website to make lots of information available to the public. Our city was way behind in the IT area and it affected its ability to operate efficiently. I applaud her efforts to add transparency to her administration.

Our new PlaniTulsa process has also worked to be inclusive and transparent. Right now, we trust that this will continue until the process is finished. As citizens of Tulsa, we should all take some time to engage ourselves with our own ideas for the future and share with the PlaniTulsa process.

There is a perception by some that to operate in a transparent way is messy, time consuming and leads to extended delays. This can be true sometimes, but it does help gain the trust and cooperation of the people-tax payers and voters alike.

Let us all reflect on the true benefit of transparency in all we do-TRUST!

November Focus: Experiences from the National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference…

What an exciting time for everyone who believes in Tulsa’s architectural history and in preserving it for Tulsa’s future generations!

The Good News is Tulsa’s preservationists are not alone!

The National Trust for Historic Preservation brought 2000 of its members to Tulsa from all across the nation so the world could see and experience Tulsa’s vast wealth of Art Deco buildings and our beautiful older neighborhoods.

They also came to ignite the spark of action for all Tulsans to come together to value and to save these treasures before it is too late!

The week was filled with inspiring speeches by former Cherokee Chief Wilma Mankiller, National Trust President Richard Moe, Sonic CEO and National Trust chairman of the Board of Trustees J. Clifford Hudson, eminent historian Nell Irvin Painter, PhD, and well-known urbanist, Anthony M. Tung among others.

Conference attendees were amazed at our large collection of Art Deco architecture. What a valuable asset Tulsan’s have to celebrate! Attendees were equally impressed with our beautiful older neighborhoods.

However, these same attendees were horrified at the number of buildings that had already been demolished in downtown and at the rampant incompatible infill development in our older neighborhoods. What a tremendous loss we have allowed to happen in our city. What are we to do?

On the local level, PreserveMidtown hosted 2 bus tours of the neighborhood west of 38th street and Lewis Ave. to inform the National Trust attendees about the history of our PreserveMidtown organization. The attendees and trustees guaranteed us that they would continue to support preservation efforts in Tulsa’s midtown neighborhoods.

PreserveMidtown founders were panelists at the conference session, “Residential Infill Development-Tearing Down the Environment.” Some of the many issues discussed included the loss of our valuable tree canopy (our community “air cleaners”), contamination of our stormwater runoff with household and building site chemicals, the overburdening of our landfills and the waste of embodied Ḁἀ

energy (energy used to produce the original housing structure). We were excited with the very active discussion by the attendees in this well-attended session.

I was particularly struck by the closing plenary session. Nell Painter and Anthony Tung spoke about the importance of our architectural history to our combined cultures. Both authors suggested that Tulsa needs to be building bridges between the past and the future, between economic development and how saving 2% of the city’s building stock can generate millions of dollars in historical tourism. Anthony Tung was very clear about the irreparable danger of destroying the architectural and cultural heritage of Tulsa that makes it unique among America’s cities.

The National Trust left us with a challenge as Tulsa marches into the future with our new comprehensive plan-determine what you as an individual and as a city can do to save your architectural heritage!

We are fortunate to have many groups committed to preservation like the Tulsa Foundation for Architecture, the Oklahoma Historical Society, COHN historical neighborhood group, the Preservation Commission, neighborhood associations and many citizens who do recognize the value of preservation to our culture and quality of life. Find a group that interests you and join them. If you don’t have the time to join them, then do all you can to support their efforts!

Richard Moe, President of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, said it best: ”This year’s National Preservation Conference takes place in one of America’s most interesting and dynamic cities. Tulsa has a rich history embracing a strong Native American presence, the near-legendary decades of cowboys and homesteaders, the oil boom of the 1920′s and 1930′s and the heyday of Route 66, the iconic “Mother Road.” These and other periods are represented in a marvelous array of historic landscapes, neighborhoods and buildings culminating in the dazzling collection of Art Deco landmarks for which the city is justly famous among preservationists and architectural buffs.”

The National Trust for Historic Preservation will host its 2009 conference in Nashville, Tennessee. Tulsa is the smallest city that has ever hosted the National Trust Conference. I think that speaks volumes on a national level that Tulsa has an architectural heritage worth preserving!

Next Page »